Showing posts with label Gaza. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gaza. Show all posts

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Join the Global BDS Movement! Boycott Israel!

Israeli children sign bombs to be dropped on the people of Lebanon in 2006

copyright: picture/text is from http://bdsmovement.net/


In Israel "the children sign bombs" before they are used!


Join the Global BDS Movement! Boycott Israel! http://bdsmovement.net/


Israeli forces and settlers watch as an occupation bulldozer destroys a Palestinian water tank

copyright: picture/text is from http://bdsmovement.net/


Please! Take action now! The time for action is now!

Join the Global Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Movement

stop supporting Israel and the killing by non-action
stop believing what Israel says
stop believing that Hamas is the solution or the sole/main cause
stop this killing and mutilation of children
stop the destruction of these children's lives by Israel
stop believing that the rockets fired at Israel are the real problem (take a deeper, critical look)
stop the way Israel treats these children day in and day out
stop a culture that allows and encourages children to sign bombs that will kill other children, parents, and innocent people


YOU are change!

YOU
can bring the change needed!

YOU and ONLY YOU can bring change!

In 2002, the Occupation dropped a one-ton bomb on a civilian area of Gaza, killing nine children

copyright: picture/text is from http://bdsmovement.net/


This time 1,314 Palestinians were killed

412 of them children

5,300 men, women and children were injured


and in Israel the children sign bombs and shells before they are used!



Please! I call on you! Take action now!

Join the Global BDS Movement!


go to: http://bdsmovement.net/

or create your own movement!

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Bullets in the brain, shrapnel in the spine

See the telegragh.co.uk article:

Bullets in the brain, shrapnel in the spine: the terrible injuries suffered by children of Gaza

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/palestinianauthority/4279102/Bullets-in-the-brain-shrapnel-in-the-spine-the-terrible-injuries-suffered-by-children-of-Gaza.html

Take action

stop supporting Israel and the killing by non-action
stop believing what Israel says
stop believing that Hamas is the solution or the cause
stop this killing and mutilation of children
stop the destruction of these children's lives by Israel
stop believing that the rockets fired at Israel are the real problem (take a deeper, critical look)
stop the way Israel treats these children day in and day out

Take action

YOU are the real solution!
YOU are the ONLY real solution

Join the

Movement to Boycott Israel

or create a new movement!


(see articles on left side under Take Action)

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Change, what is change? $150m in “small change" that's what "change" is!

Barack Obama's inauguration cost is predicted to reach over $150m!

$42.3m was spent on George Bush's inauguration in 2005

and

$33m spent on Bill Clinton's in 1993

The economy is is great trouble, not just in America but all over the world. People are losing jobs everywhere. People are losing their houses! People are losing all they have! People are losing their lives! Yet $150m can be spent for this!

A $700 billion Wall Street bailout was asked for and arranged, so perhaps Obama thinks $150m is “nothing” but "small change" in comparison. A drop in the ocean. What does it matter! At a time when “change” is really needed due to the extremely serious downturn in the American and World economy Obama lets the cost of his inauguration reach this absorbent amount. Lets not fool ourselves, Obama could have prevented this if had reallly wanted. But he has stayed as silent on this matter as he has on others.

Over 1000 people killed in Gaza, but what has that got to do with it, nothing, they are just people....

....all that matters is having a $150m party!

And this is “change”?

The Killers of Children! More than 1,000 killed in Gaza

More than 1,000 killed in Gaza

.........more than a third of these are children.....

......And we do nothing.... NOTHING....

......We, yes.... YOU AND I..............we do NOTHING...

......we do nothing about Israel and what Israel does...

......we use the same old arguments.......

...... believe the same old arguments...

......that have been used time and time again....year after year......

......this is KILLING.........pure

.....The silence of Obama...the words of Hillary Clinton are sickening.......

......almost as sickening as the actions of Israel ...

......but WE.......WE do NOTHING...............

......are we not sickening too........... ?

An introduction to the word “change”

Change! Such a nice word. Nice and short, and you don't need a sentence to offer so much (or so little) with this word.

Lets take an example. I'm a heavy smoker and it is December 2008, I have a really bad cough and the state of my health is not good because of this. I promise I am going to “change” for 2009. I tell everyone this, putting the emphasis on “change” so that everyone thinks I am going to stop smoking, convince everyone I'm going to bring “change”. 2009 comes. People are surprised to see me still smoking away. I point out that I have changed. I now smoke filter cigarettes. The people are not that impressed. So I point out that I also now smoke the low nicotine cigarettes. To really impress them of my “change” I tell them I go for a short jog each day (taking a pack of low nicotine filter cigarettes with me of course). And I tell them I am going to do this.....or...that... and do here and there this or that....... I still smoke of course, but I have brought change......

Hillary Clinton appearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: besides dodging the questions about her husbands actions and fund-raising and the serious question of “the conflict of interests” (so “change” is put to test straight away and what do you think happened - yes your right - were still smoking)

On the extremely serious question of Gaza and all those dead and dying people Hillary Clinton did some more political dodging. She came out with such “changing words” regarding the violence (Killing) in Palestine such as “must only increase our determination to seek a just and lasting peace agreement” . Now I don't know about you but I have the feeling I have heard those words, or similar words, so often before, but I must be wrong, because this is all about “change." She did get around to mention her “husbands” actions and policies in the past (so another clear indication that were going to get “change”). She also expressed that she was “deeply sympathetic” to Israel’s right to defend itself against rocket attacks.......Oh wow......a clear indication of “CHANGE” and if this isn't enough to convince you of “REAL CHANGE” then what about this......she reiterated her opposition to direct negotiations with Hamas unless it renounces violence and recognizes Israel.................

....now isn't that "REAL CHANGE" for you!.......(cough....cough.....cough.....cough...... ....cough....cough.........sounds like I'm getting better).

So now we know it folks “real” I mean "real" change is coming......cough....cough.....cough........”

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Hey, did Obama or the Clinton's win the election? Is this really change?

(This article is extension of article below this one)

It doesn't look very promising does it? Is this change? Is it real change? Are these peole going to provide “change”! It looks very doubtful. Okay, I can hear some of you saying “give him a chance, he is not President, not in power, yet”! Yeah okay, but he didn't get elected on the basis of “give me a chance” he got elected on the basis of “change” and I am sure that most people meant “real change” when they voted. So what about his silence or non-action over the Israel – Gaza situation with over 900 dead. Is this change, real change? So the "I am not yet President" silence and non-action, is this a sign of real change? Wouldn't real change have meant doing something, something different from the past, which includes not remaining silent, non-active just because presidency has not yet taken force. Doesn't this mean taking action that is really different from the past, not following routines and ideas from the past, and policies of the past? Even doing something even though the presidency has not yet come into force? Wouldn't this be the real change? Are we truly seeing change here? Change from the Bush policy, the Clinton policy, and all the policies before that! Is this just more of the same, in a different wrapping?

Is this really change? Does this really promise real change? Yeah right, the court is still out on this one! But somehow or other, sadly, I feel it might not be..........

Hey, did Obama or the Clinton's win the election?

Hey, who is running the show folks?

Obama.: More of the same? And the same from whom?

Over 900 dead in Gaza and still Obama says and does nothing! Israel and Jewish influence still is the master!

Obama's determination to carry on the fight in Afghanistan! Does this mean another war loving President?

Hillary Clinton as secretary of state? The papers talk of „...conflicts of interest...“! What conflict of interests? It is possible that some people might see this as some kind of pay-off position, but there is no evidence of that. Of course she is married to an ex-president who still has much power and sway, and whose charitable foundation have received a number of donations from foreign governments and multinational corporations. And who is still actively busy in business and political matters all over the world. She did run for president herself, and only gave up reluctantly (has she really given up?), so she has strong ideas and policies of her own, she was rather quick to vote for the Iraq war (so does this mean she is another warmonger?), Obama and Hillary Clinton clashed on some foreign policy issues during the primary campaign ........So, what conflict of interests?

Robert Gates: a former director of the CIA, appointed Defence Secretary by President Bush and who promoted the military surge in Iraq..................

Eric Holder: another Clinton ...he was number two in the Clinton Administration Justice Department

Susan Rice, to be UN ambassador was also in Clinton administration

Lisa Jackson to head Environmental Protection Agency -worked for the EPA under Bill Clinton

Shaun Donovan: Secretary of Housing/Urban Development - was also in the Clinton Administration

Tom Vilsack: Agriculture Secretary - endorsed Hillary Clinton in the primaries.

Leon Panetta: to head the CIA (?) - former Clinton White House chief of staff

Janet Napolitano: to head the Department of Homeland Security - President Bill Clinton appointed her US Attorney for the District of Arizona.

whose show is this really?

Friday, January 09, 2009

Don't wait for Obama they will all be dead, …..for Bush that is okay

Forget Obama he is only “concerned” for the press but not concerned enough to do something, speak out, take the risk....

if this is change....

(the usual political games and manoeuvres, staying out of trouble to keep your seat and the votes, don't rock the boat, be careful of the powerful Jewish and other powerful right-wingers...stay on the old road, old policies, old tactics, old everything...)

then lets forget this kind of change, forget Obama and his kind of change...and we can all (accept Israel who are grateful to him) certainly forget Bush....(and we forgot him in this sense long ago....but we wont be able to forget what he did to the world, and how many lives have been lost, how much destruction.....)

it is YOU who brings real change YOU AND ONLY YOU

Stop the Killing – TAKE ACTION! Stop Israel!

If the links are the wrong ones for your country then go to yours and do the same!

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/index.asp

http://www.protectthehuman.com/


and look at articles such as these:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090126/klein?rel=hpbox

Stop the Killing - Take Action

Stop the Killing – Take Action! Stop Israel!

If the links are the wrong ones for your country then go to yours and do the same!

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/index.asp

http://www.protectthehuman.com/


and look at articles such as these:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090126/klein?rel=hpbox


and concerning other matters of today:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081117/klein

See the side bar for other links to Naomi Klein articles.



Thursday, January 08, 2009

Over 700 DEAD Mr. "Concerned" Obama

Over 700 DEAD Mr. "Concerned" Obama

The Red Cross has accused Israel of failing to fulfil its obligation to help wounded civilians in Gaza.

International Red Cross workers find four weak and scared children beside their mothers' bodies in houses hit by shelling in Zeitoun.


Shame on you! Shame on your kind of change! Shame on Israel!

and as for Bush.........

The Obama dinner party

As dead bodies of men, women and children litter Gaza Obama the president of the future with presidents of present and past cut the meat of another dead body. Champagne, caviar and foie gras were all on the menu as people in Gaza starve, have nothing to drink, and are surrounded by the dead meat and dead bodies, that were once family, friends, daughters, sons, fathers, mothers, aunts, uncles, school friends, neighbours, and innocent people.

Obama is deeply concerned he said, he is certainly showing it!

This is change to Obama!

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

My oh my Obama is “deeply concerned“

My oh my, Obama is „deeply concerned„! What about! There is nothing to be „deeply concerned“ about is there? I mean Israel has only killed about 600 people or more, and goodness knows wounded how many more, and many of these children and women or innocent men! What has Obama to be concerned about? And why should he be concerned at all, after all he is only the president elect that takes office in a few days time. Why should he be bothered or concerned with such matters? The inauguration party is more important! Sitting on the fence is more important! Not upsetting those Jewish power bosses and voters and right-wingers is more important. Not going against the American trend of supporting Israel no matter what they do, or treat other people, is more important. Why should Obama be „deeply concerned“! What good is that going to do anyway, lets get on with the big party in Washington, that’s more important, that’s what we have be more concerned about!