Friday, November 03, 2006

Building a Nuclear Bomb? Bush administration shows you how on internet

The internet is a great place. You can get cooking lessons; learn all about how a car or some piece of machinery works. You can learn how to build a house, or make a film. So why not also publish the details of how to build a nuclear bomb on the internet? Well perhaps some of you might be a little less happy with this idea, but do not worry President Bush’s administration and the Republican Party in Congress have the matter under control.

Moreover, if “they” have it under control there should be no reason for anyone else to worry about anything, should there now? After all, “they” are working to make the world a better and safer place, are they not? Therefore, if they think everyone should have the instructions how to build a nuclear bomb, then please do not grumble and complain, because we have just agreed that they are working to make the world a safer place for all of us.

Of course there is one little bit of bad news for you, if you don’t already have the instructions then you are too late. Apparently, Bush’s administration took the instructions off the internet yesterday. Yeah, I know that is bad news but I am sure it is only a temporary matter, so don’t worry, we can rely on the Bush administration to replace it with some other juicy details. It is only a slight hitch, some busybodies from the International Atomic Energy Agency have been complaining privately, you know how these busybody types are, always sticking their nose into matters that don’t concern them, trying to stop Bush and his administration from making the world a safer place for all of us.

Listen don’t worry, the republican congress was behind this whole idea as well so they will help Bush get this sorted out and have the details back online. That is the trouble these days just too many busybodies getting in the way of Bush who is doing really great work around the world.

(See article at New York Times: U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer, http://www.nytimes.com/)

No comments: